3 ms·
$32 mil is a lot to aim for, but their goal was to see if there is an marketplace for cutting edge technology where innovation can really thrive. If you lowere
by martin-adams 13y ago
$32 mil is a lot to aim for, but their goal was to see if there is an marketplace for cutting edge technology where innovation can really thrive. If you lowered the threshold then it starts to lose what they set out to prove - is the industry too scared to innovate because they will lose their market share.
They have proved there is a market for £12 mil on a product that is only a concept at this stage. Had this product been in stores today I believe they would have sold far more than $32 mil, both from the immediate availability but also increased exposure.
I am looking forward to seeing the Ubuntu phones come. It shouldn't be seen as a failure as to Canonical, it was an experiment. They tested to see if people would go wild for something like this and now they know that people do want it, but it's not as straightforward as they now need to get the mainstream manufacturers on board and sell a product, not a concept.
At least that's my take on it.
- mercurial 13y agoI don't know. I believe that "phones that can replace a computer" are years away still. So you are left with a Linux phone, and I'd bet the Jolla people to get it right. Also, I haven't tried Ubuntu Touch but the little I've seen of Unity hasn't really blown me away.
- dalek_cannes 13y agoI agree. Is this a phone that I can: 1. Hold to my ear when a call arrives, without unplugging the video cable to my screen? 2. Wave around without fear of it falling and shattering to bits, taking most of my digital life with it (unless I'm using cloud/NSA)?