3 ms·
On one level, it reads like right wing think tank propaganda, given that the conservative party didn't oppose many of the things labour did. Indeed, one reason
by alan_cx 13y ago
On one level, it reads like right wing think tank propaganda, given that the conservative party didn't oppose many of the things labour did. Indeed, one reason labour won power was that it adopted conservative economic policy. Old socialist policy was never going to work. But, all of the things that set up the false economy was conservative doctrine. That is why "new" labour had business support and won. So, yes labour got it wrong, but the conservatives would have too. Conservatives love a property, borrowing and spending boom. Its how Thatcher made her name in the 80's. A British disease.
However, fascinating for me was the bit right at the end:
Where the general public is concerned,
one of the most distressing features
of Britain’s evolution over the last
two decades has to have been the
relentless spread of surveillance and
coercion. Britain is plastered with
warning notices, CCTV and speed
cameras, and other aspects of the
surveillance state. Government needs
to start stripping away much of this
panoply of surveillance and coercion,
and to enshrine in law the primacy
of individual liberties.
So presumably, part of their conclusion is that all this is actually damaging the economy. And, that conclusion was pre Snowden...
- cryofan 13y agoyep, definitely neoliberal think tank propaganda of the TINA (There Is No Alternative) variety. What the game is now is to scare the older folks into thinking that unless they vote for neoliberal sell-out politicians, there will be no funding of their old age pensions, etc. So once the think tanks (funded by Capital) have manufactured sufficient consent through scare-TINA propaganda, they get the politicians to allow massive waves of cheap labor immigration and lessening worker protections and benefits. Same old game they have been playing for decades now.