4 ms·
More likely, it's easy to convince a teenager. "yeah, there may be a few rogues out in the middle of a war zone. There are hundreds of thousands that serve with
by jfoutz 13y ago
More likely, it's easy to convince a teenager. "yeah, there may be a few rogues out in the middle of a war zone. There are hundreds of thousands that serve with honor, and those that don't will be punished. Please sign here.
- jlgreco 13y agoAbsolutely, though I'd consider such naive trusting to fall somewhere in the general neighborhood of "living under a rock".
- philangist 13y agoOr being 18 years old ;)
- graycat 13y agoOne view of the military recruiting teenagers is that the military exploits the fact that a large fraction of teenagers are really eager to belong to something.
- anigbrowl 13y agoIf that's your argument, then we shouldn't trust them with the ability to vote, enter into contracts, or get married.
- praptak 13y agoOnly if we start from the premise that there is no middle ground between totally infallible and too stupid to take any responsibility.
- graycat 13y agoI meant teenage boys. Okay, you have a really nice daughter, cute, sweet, pretty, darling, adorable, precious, a girl you have never been able to say "No" to, who has had you wrapped around her little finger since she was six months old, great student, cooks, sews, plays piano, great babysitter, loves kids, popular, etc. and at 16 falls in love with a boy 18 and wants to get married. You "trust" him with your daughter? That little scenario aside, the claim in my statement is that the military doesn't just use the strong desire of teenage boys to be members of groups but exploits it. The exploitation is in basic training, etc. It's a manipulation. For voting, entering into contracts, and usually even marriage, the role of manipulation is usually much lower and the consequences less deadly.