>in fact, they told him no bug was reported, so we could technically reach the conclusion that no "rules" were broken. Err, how do you come to that conclusion?

>in fact, they told him no bug was reported, so we could technically reach the conclusion that no "rules" were broken. Err, how do you come to that conclusion? It is against FB's ToS to knowingly muck with userdata that isn't yours or that you don't have permission to access. It doesn't matter what you're doing, knowingly messing with user data is against the ToS. And while yes, the FB staff member could have responded better I'm not terribly surprised or upset with how they did respond. Most of the text of the email was describing the author's lack of job. The "report" was simply a link with no real information. When sifting through bug reports, this one exudes "this isn't an actual bug"