You have not stated something that's mutually exclusive with the statement you are replying to. It's possible for military law to be used precisely as the perso

You have not stated something that's mutually exclusive with the statement you are replying to. It's possible for military law to be used precisely as the person was claiming it was - to support the implementation of questionable policy through enforced ignorance of the people. Indeed one could argue that to a great extent that's what military law in this regard is for in the first place. # Personally, I think there's only room for one law in a country. The minute you start splitting off separate courts for special interests, in which civilian juries can't intervene, you make a mockery of the idea of civilian control - separate it too far from the issues for it to be meaningfully applied.