6 ms·

When is it ever healthy to rush preparing and eating your meals on a regular basis?

gnaritas 13y ago
That's rather the point of people wanting something like Soilent to begin with, people often don't want to take the time necessary to make proper healthy food. It shouldn't be so much work to fuel up.
- foobarbazqux 13y ago
  My point is that taking the time necessary to make (and eat) proper healthy food is a large part of what makes it healthy.
  - gnaritas 13y ago
    Which is the bug things like Soilent (not that I support Soilent) are trying to fix. In this day and age, science should be able to fix problems like this so we can have fast and healthy food. You're begging the question.
    - foobarbazqux 13y ago
      Preparing food slowly and eating it slowly together with other people and enjoying the entire process is psychologically healthy. Michael Pollan has written extensively about this. It's not just about the nutrients.
      - gnaritas 13y ago
        You know what else is psychologically healthy, not being forced to spend hours a day preparing and eating food. Not everyone enjoys the process and it's not psychologically healthy for those who don't, it's a pain in the ass. Guess what, some of us don't like other people that much either and can't stand the idea of having to regularly eat meals with them. Michael Pollan is a foodie and an English major, he has no credentials with which to say what is or isn't psychologically healthy. His "opinion" on the matter is just that, an opinion.
        foobarbazqux 13y ago
        Pollan is an investigative journalist more than anything. But whatever, it was just a pointer. There is quite a bit written out there about the psychological aspects of eating. I'll agree that Soylent is healthier fast food than McDonald's. I just won't agree that eating Soylent on a regular basis is as healthy as taking your time and sharing non-McDonald's meals with your friends and/or family. Everyone has friends and family. I guess I feel like Soylent is encouraging social isolation, and helping people to deprive themselves of the physical pleasure of eating. I'll also agree that spending hours a day preparing food sucks. That's for professional chefs and stay-at-home spouses to choose. But a maximum average of an hour total per day is pretty reasonable in my opinion.
        gnaritas 13y ago
        I'm not talking about Soilent itself, but about Soilent like things. The chances that Soilent itself is good are pretty slim as its just some kid experimenting. However, there will come a product eventually that can completely replace food and be healthy, and many will embrace it with open arms because most of the time, fuel is just fuel, not an event. An hour a day is too much, and it isn't depriving us of anything; people will still be able to take pleasure in eating real food when they want to, they just won't be forced to at every meal. And you're a bit disconnected from reality, no everyone does not have family and friends; you should think really hard about why you think they do and about how insensitive it is to presume that. Tons of people have no family left, and tons of people are friendless either by choice or not.
        foobarbazqux 13y ago
        You're right, I was being insensitive. I'm sorry about that. I'm still curious though, why don't you like eating real food and sharing it with people?
        __--__ 13y ago
        I just won't agree that eating Soylent on a regular basis is as healthy as taking your time and sharing non-McDonald's meals with your friends and/or family. Assuming you're an extrovert. I'm an introvert and I eat alone. Most days, it's the only time I get to be alone and recharge. I guess I feel like Soylent is encouraging social isolation, and helping people to deprive themselves of the physical pleasure of eating. Not everybody is wired the same. I know plenty of people who get no physical pleasure from eating. They look at those with food addiction and simply don't get the appeal. They'd rather be doing something productive/social/physical/recreational. I'm personally not one of those people, but I can understand where they're coming from. For some people, running marathons gives them a high bigger and better than any drug. I look at those people and simply don't get the appeal. :)

That's rather the point of people wanting something like Soilent to begin with, people often don't want to take the time necessary to make proper healthy food. It shouldn't be so much work to fuel up.

foobarbazqux 13y ago
My point is that taking the time necessary to make (and eat) proper healthy food is a large part of what makes it healthy.
- gnaritas 13y ago
  Which is the bug things like Soilent (not that I support Soilent) are trying to fix. In this day and age, science should be able to fix problems like this so we can have fast and healthy food. You're begging the question.
  - foobarbazqux 13y ago
    Preparing food slowly and eating it slowly together with other people and enjoying the entire process is psychologically healthy. Michael Pollan has written extensively about this. It's not just about the nutrients.
    - gnaritas 13y ago
      You know what else is psychologically healthy, not being forced to spend hours a day preparing and eating food. Not everyone enjoys the process and it's not psychologically healthy for those who don't, it's a pain in the ass. Guess what, some of us don't like other people that much either and can't stand the idea of having to regularly eat meals with them. Michael Pollan is a foodie and an English major, he has no credentials with which to say what is or isn't psychologically healthy. His "opinion" on the matter is just that, an opinion.
      - foobarbazqux 13y ago
        Pollan is an investigative journalist more than anything. But whatever, it was just a pointer. There is quite a bit written out there about the psychological aspects of eating. I'll agree that Soylent is healthier fast food than McDonald's. I just won't agree that eating Soylent on a regular basis is as healthy as taking your time and sharing non-McDonald's meals with your friends and/or family. Everyone has friends and family. I guess I feel like Soylent is encouraging social isolation, and helping people to deprive themselves of the physical pleasure of eating. I'll also agree that spending hours a day preparing food sucks. That's for professional chefs and stay-at-home spouses to choose. But a maximum average of an hour total per day is pretty reasonable in my opinion.
        gnaritas 13y ago
        I'm not talking about Soilent itself, but about Soilent like things. The chances that Soilent itself is good are pretty slim as its just some kid experimenting. However, there will come a product eventually that can completely replace food and be healthy, and many will embrace it with open arms because most of the time, fuel is just fuel, not an event. An hour a day is too much, and it isn't depriving us of anything; people will still be able to take pleasure in eating real food when they want to, they just won't be forced to at every meal. And you're a bit disconnected from reality, no everyone does not have family and friends; you should think really hard about why you think they do and about how insensitive it is to presume that. Tons of people have no family left, and tons of people are friendless either by choice or not.
        foobarbazqux 13y ago
        You're right, I was being insensitive. I'm sorry about that. I'm still curious though, why don't you like eating real food and sharing it with people?
        __--__ 13y ago
        I just won't agree that eating Soylent on a regular basis is as healthy as taking your time and sharing non-McDonald's meals with your friends and/or family. Assuming you're an extrovert. I'm an introvert and I eat alone. Most days, it's the only time I get to be alone and recharge. I guess I feel like Soylent is encouraging social isolation, and helping people to deprive themselves of the physical pleasure of eating. Not everybody is wired the same. I know plenty of people who get no physical pleasure from eating. They look at those with food addiction and simply don't get the appeal. They'd rather be doing something productive/social/physical/recreational. I'm personally not one of those people, but I can understand where they're coming from. For some people, running marathons gives them a high bigger and better than any drug. I look at those people and simply don't get the appeal. :)