> then you know you're on to something No, no you don't. That's the whole point of doing scientific experiments. Your brain is very, very, extremely bad at jud

> then you know you're on to something No, no you don't. That's the whole point of doing scientific experiments. Your brain is very, very, extremely bad at judging objectively. Any subjective "test" is simply no test at all. > Also, numbers like weight and computer mental agility tests also can be quite reliable if you are consistent in your testing... That's a pretty big 'if', plus a 'can' and a 'quite'. > ...and they aren't subject to misinterpretation or wishful thinking That's the whole point of the OT in this discussion thread. They very much clearly are subject to misinterpretation. A zillion factors can impact weight and "mental agility". People aren't lab rats because they don't live in labs and aren't rats.