I was referring to his original rant on C++: http://250bpm.com/blog:4 http://250bpm.com/blog:4 and http://250bpm.com/blog:8 http://250bpm.com/blog:8. They are p

I was referring to his original rant on C++: http://250bpm.com/blog:4 http://250bpm.com/blog:4 and http://250bpm.com/blog:8 http://250bpm.com/blog:8. They are pretty misinformed. He claims in C++ the erasing solution is O(n) where it is O(1) in C. This doesn't make any sense of course. The comments you are referring to where he moderates his position are resulting from the comments he received from the C++ community regarding his incorrect statements.