3 ms·
I think it's not the value of data should be reduced, it's the cost of access to the data should be increased. If it would be too expensive to watch everyone, t
by cLeEOGPw 13y ago
I think it's not the value of data should be reduced, it's the cost of access to the data should be increased. If it would be too expensive to watch everyone, they would naturally stop doing that.
- jlgreco 13y agoThey would just find more contractors eager to bill the increased expenses.
- dobbsbob 13y agoOr they would force even more backdoors into proprietary hardware than they do already. For all we know Intel and AMD could have microcode to sabotage RNG and they can already decrypt anything with ease using a skeleton key to predict the randomness.
- jlgreco 13y agoI've always (probably very naively) hoped that competition keeps chip makers honest. If anyone does something naughty then their competitors would probably discover it while reverse engineering the other's product. Now that I say that, it sounds even more naive than I previously thought. All bets are probably off.