4 ms·
i'm pretty sure the real reason for C is that the author is just more familiar with it (which is a fine point imo) now there's other things i'd criticize, like
by zobzu 13y ago
i'm pretty sure the real reason for C is that the author is just more familiar with it (which is a fine point imo)
now there's other things i'd criticize, like nanomsg is a trademark of the company.. so if you repackage it i'm suspecting you have to rename all the stuff, for example.
- rumcajz 13y agoThe trademark can be passed to a foundation so that it's not controlled by any particular company. However, even then, if you modify the code you should name it differently to prevent confusion.
- damien 13y agoWhy would you be pretty sure he is more familiar with C when most of his past projects were written in C++? Not to mention that he's written two blog posts explaining his reasoning... I'm not sure the trademark is a big deal, it's probably to prevent misuse like what happened with the Linux trademark (which took a few years to resolve). I doubt he's doing it to make it more annoying to use.