4 ms·
Not exactly a diagram but the a video of the test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz2FMfv-CSc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz2FMfv-CSc A bmw 3 series (not fu
by curiousDog 13y ago
Not exactly a diagram but the a video of the test:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz2FMfv-CSc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz2FMfv-CSc
A bmw 3 series (not full frontal):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XG8BQt4sHY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XG8BQt4sHY
- ISL 13y agoModern crash engineering is really impressive (that under-car view is really neat!) This 2009 vs. 1959 offset crash shows how much things have changed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joMK1WZjP7g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joMK1WZjP7g
- trafficlight 13y agoWow. The windshield doesn't even crack.
- kmfrk 13y agoYou have to consider that there is no engine in the front - just empty space for storage. That changes the game of frontal collisions completely.
- klinquist 13y ago0:58 - 1:07 of the first video link... the car continues to attempt to propel itself into the wall.
- _mulder_ 13y agoOnly for 0.3 seconds. The first camera shot at normal speed show's how quick this is all happening.
- bradleyland 13y agoIt's really unfair to compare offset and frontal crash tests. You can't draw any conclusions by comparing the two. For years, auto manufacturers were able to perform competently in the frontal crash test, but when the offset test was introduced, the failure rate went through the roof. I don't mean to diminish the performance of the Tesla Model S. It is, without qualification, an incredible car. I just don't think comparing it to the offset video of a BMW are relevant.