3 ms·
Steven Frank of Panic said it best: "Of course, it’s not all bad. As everyone knows, the iPhone app submission process works like this: Develop app / Submit ap
by zimbabwe 17y ago
Steven Frank of Panic said it best:
"Of course, it’s not all bad. As everyone knows, the iPhone app submission process works like this: Develop app / Submit app / App rejected / Blogs raise a stink / App approved. So, these guys are merely mired in step 4 and we can look forward to their app being approved within a week or two."
- andrewljohnson 17y agoOur app got accepted immediately, and was developed by someone who had never done an iPhone app before. It's pretty simple if your app isn't controversial and you are good at following directions.
- daeken 17y agoThe real problem is the definition of "controversial". How many people would've batted an eye at a plain-text version of the Kama Sutra if this was released when it was first submitted?
- swilliams 17y agoThe catch is that Eucalyptus really isn't controversial.
- wooster 17y agoI submitted 12 almost identical applications (code was identical, data was not). They were all approved. Then, I submitted updates for all 12 of these applications. 2 were rejected. These were city maps, so it's not like they were controversial. The process is just broken.
- zimbabwe 17y agoAn ebook reader that accesses Gutenberg is not controversial in the least. Most apps aren't denied. But the ones that are denied aren't always denied for logical reasons. Baby Shaker was approved. Eucalyptus was denied. That's messed up.
- rrival 17y agoWould enjoy seeing a popularity comparison between apps that follow the 5 step process vs apps that are approved immediately - does it affect app growth positively to get stuck at step 4?