3 ms·
With wording like that, it's very possible that some people could interpret speech to be a tool of terror. Bona fide investigative journalism certainly can sat
by malandrew 13y ago
With wording like that, it's very possible that some people could interpret speech to be a tool of terror.
Bona fide investigative journalism certainly can satisfy the criteria for (b) and (c). Is there anywhere where they define the nature of the threat? Does it just have to be "perceived" as a threat or does the threat need to be physical as opposed to informational?
- grey-area 13y agoIs there anywhere where they define the nature of the threat? Section 2, quoted by symmetry above - 1 a,b and c must be satisfied before terrorism is applicable. Satisfying 1a requires satisfying at least one item from section 2, which is a list of possible actions which can be considered terrorism. Endangering life, serious violence against people or property, risk to health or safety etc. Far too broad of course, but still not applicable to Miranda.