4 ms·
I think the important part too, is when he technically violated the TOS it was only to get their attention because he was otherwise being ignored. I don't see a
by LandoCalrissian 13y ago
I think the important part too, is when he technically violated the TOS it was only to get their attention because he was otherwise being ignored. I don't see any reason they should not want to pay him.
- jack-r-abbit 13y agoFWIW, his initial bug report included a link to a post he made on a non-friend's wall. So his first TOS violation was prior to his first attempt to file a bug. The second TOS violation (posting on Zuck's wall) was what got him press time.