3 ms·
This article gives no new information, it is stupid. Now i will speculate: As long as he does not know his customers passwords he can't retroactively view the
by callesgg 13y ago
This article gives no new information, it is stupid.
Now i will speculate:
As long as he does not know his customers passwords he can't retroactively view the customers mails, once the mails have been encrypted and the plain-text thrown away the stuff is unreachable.
So the US gov probably wanted him to save his customers passwords when they logged in.
- m8urn 13y agoRight and the important point being that this isn't just about sniffing his network, it is the most invasive surveillance possible that would make his whole business a lie. The point of the article was to go through the logic to show that this would have been the only possibility for what they requested him to do.