4 ms·
This. On one hand, we hate credentialism and criticize those who arrogantly wave their diplomas around as a substitute for making good arguments. On the other h
by austinz 13y ago
This. On one hand, we hate credentialism and criticize those who arrogantly wave their diplomas around as a substitute for making good arguments. On the other hand, we're enamored enough with SpaceX and Tesla to give Musk the benefit of the doubt, even though:
- The Hyperloop is a very different type of engineering compared to anything Musk and his engineers have done before (competency in one field does not guarantee competency in a very different field),
- The analysis has some serious issues. A trivial example: the thermal expansion issue in this blog post has been brought up in user discussion several times in previously posted Hyperloop articles on HN, and nobody was able to post a good response or justification.
- lisper 13y agoAnd it only takes one unsolved show-stopper to make everything else you've done irrelevant.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- ash 13y ago> the thermal expansion issue in this blog post has been brought up The author missed the "not rigidly fixed" part when he was analyzing thermal expansion issue. My comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6238022 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6238022