5 ms·

Someone correct my thinking: you don't have to add up all the expansions because you don't butt each pipe against the next. You leave that 1.5" gap, you build t

by delinka 13y ago

Someone correct my thinking: you don't have to add up all the expansions because you don't butt each pipe against the next. You leave that 1.5" gap, you build the gap ring out of airtight handwavium, and the tube sections don't push each other around. Right? This is how I read Musk's original proposal.

clarkmoody 13y ago
I believe you're correct. May I add that the air bearings on each capsule will be lined with an alloy of anti-handwavium to achieve the desired fly-height above said airtight fittings.
phreeza 13y ago
Handwavium just made my day. Thanks for that.
dspeyer 13y ago
Airtight handwavium that meets the other specs may be hard to come by. I can't think of a precedent. And the original design called for all the space at the ends to avoid needing that (which doesn't work).
nether 13y ago
You use expansion joints like these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flanged_Rubber_Bellows.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flanged_Rubber_Bellows.jp... They're made of rubber, fiberglass and other flexible but strong materials. I don't know how well they'd handle the vacuum stresses but I don't think it'd be too extreme.
- ars 13y ago
  That won't work because the capsule has to ride on the pipe wall. Any bump will destroy the capsule.
6ren 13y ago
I think there is an inconsistency in the proposal, because he clearly mentioned cumulative expansion (page 5 of the pdf https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.spacex.com/sites/spacex/files/hyperloop_alpha.pdf https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.spacex.com/sit...): A telescoping tube, similar to the boxy ones used to access airplanes at airports would be needed at the end stations to address the cumulative length change of the tube. If you're absorbing all the changes in length at the pylons, you don't need to absorb cumulative changes. Another reading is that the welded joints don't need to coincide with the pylons - that's just how it was constructed, not how it's supported. The tube ends up being continuous, with nothing special about the part of resting on the pylons, and move freely on rollers or similar. However, this reading also doesn't work, because he says of the dampers (also page 5): These would absorb the small length changes between pylons due to thermal changes... So, there's an inconsistency. But it doesn't seem like a big one to me, and not hard to overcome. And finding these bugs is one of the intended benefits of open-sourcing it. I haven't looked into the second finite analysis one, but though I looked for material consequences, it seems to be mainly a criticism of presentation. It amuses me that after spending his talent, time and money (he mentions at the start that he's paying for his blog) helping Musk's proposal, this fellow vents: I wouldn’t put my money, time, or talent in the hands of someone who takes me for a fool. Musk caught him monologuing.
- Gravityloss 13y ago
  A Falcon rocket is started from flat aluminium plates, which you weld into hoops. Then you weld the hoops together into a barrel. Similarly with hyperloop, you have to weld the tubes from much shorter barrel sections anyway, there's no way you're going to have 100 m x 12 m plate sections that you could then roll into a pipe. And you couldn't really bend any of that anyway at once. So there certainly are weld seams between pylons. A spiral weld might be interesting if a continuous sheet could be created at some steel mill. Some big pipes are created by welding a sheet spirally. Armadillo bought such tubes from Europe for their rockets. Though for hyperloop, bends in the pipe would require a really funny shape for the sheet. Both width and orientation of the sheet would have to change, and it would require very accurate welding ).
- delinka 13y ago
rossjudson 13y ago
No. Read the pylon section. What it says is that the tube is NOT constrained in the longitudinal direction on the pylons; it's free to slide back and forth in the direction of travel. It's only constrained vertically and laterally.
- 6ren 13y ago
  Thanks, yes, he's clearer in the technical section, p.28. (I hadn't read the whole thing.) 4.2.3. Pylons and Tunnels The tube will be supported by pillars which constrain the tube in the vertical direction but allow longitudinal slip for thermal expansion as well as dampened lateral slip to reduce the risk posed by earthquakes. The "longitudinal slip" is what I assumed/guessed with "rollers or similar" (in my comment above).

by delinka 13y ago

clarkmoody 13y ago

I believe you're correct. May I add that the air bearings on each capsule will be lined with an alloy of anti-handwavium to achieve the desired fly-height above said airtight fittings.

phreeza 13y ago

Handwavium just made my day. Thanks for that.

dspeyer 13y ago

Airtight handwavium that meets the other specs may be hard to come by. I can't think of a precedent. And the original design called for all the space at the ends to avoid needing that (which doesn't work).

nether 13y ago

You use expansion joints like these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flanged_Rubber_Bellows.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flanged_Rubber_Bellows.jp... They're made of rubber, fiberglass and other flexible but strong materials. I don't know how well they'd handle the vacuum stresses but I don't think it'd be too extreme.

ars 13y ago
That won't work because the capsule has to ride on the pipe wall. Any bump will destroy the capsule.

6ren 13y ago

I think there is an inconsistency in the proposal, because he clearly mentioned cumulative expansion (page 5 of the pdf https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.spacex.com/sites/spacex/files/hyperloop_alpha.pdf https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.spacex.com/sit...): A telescoping tube, similar to the boxy ones used to access airplanes at airports would be needed at the end stations to address the cumulative length change of the tube. If you're absorbing all the changes in length at the pylons, you don't need to absorb cumulative changes. Another reading is that the welded joints don't need to coincide with the pylons - that's just how it was constructed, not how it's supported. The tube ends up being continuous, with nothing special about the part of resting on the pylons, and move freely on rollers or similar. However, this reading also doesn't work, because he says of the dampers (also page 5): These would absorb the small length changes between pylons due to thermal changes... So, there's an inconsistency. But it doesn't seem like a big one to me, and not hard to overcome. And finding these bugs is one of the intended benefits of open-sourcing it. I haven't looked into the second finite analysis one, but though I looked for material consequences, it seems to be mainly a criticism of presentation. It amuses me that after spending his talent, time and money (he mentions at the start that he's paying for his blog) helping Musk's proposal, this fellow vents: I wouldn’t put my money, time, or talent in the hands of someone who takes me for a fool. Musk caught him monologuing.

Gravityloss 13y ago
A Falcon rocket is started from flat aluminium plates, which you weld into hoops. Then you weld the hoops together into a barrel. Similarly with hyperloop, you have to weld the tubes from much shorter barrel sections anyway, there's no way you're going to have 100 m x 12 m plate sections that you could then roll into a pipe. And you couldn't really bend any of that anyway at once. So there certainly are weld seams between pylons. A spiral weld might be interesting if a continuous sheet could be created at some steel mill. Some big pipes are created by welding a sheet spirally. Armadillo bought such tubes from Europe for their rockets. Though for hyperloop, bends in the pipe would require a really funny shape for the sheet. Both width and orientation of the sheet would have to change, and it would require very accurate welding ).
delinka 13y ago

rossjudson 13y ago

No. Read the pylon section. What it says is that the tube is NOT constrained in the longitudinal direction on the pylons; it's free to slide back and forth in the direction of travel. It's only constrained vertically and laterally.

6ren 13y ago
Thanks, yes, he's clearer in the technical section, p.28. (I hadn't read the whole thing.) 4.2.3. Pylons and Tunnels The tube will be supported by pillars which constrain the tube in the vertical direction but allow longitudinal slip for thermal expansion as well as dampened lateral slip to reduce the risk posed by earthquakes. The "longitudinal slip" is what I assumed/guessed with "rollers or similar" (in my comment above).