3 ms·

Thanks for that! I myself always had MurmurHash (https://code.google.com/p/smhasher/wiki/MurmurHash3 https://code.google.com/p/smhasher/wiki/MurmurHash3) in min

by aktau 13y ago

Thanks for that! I myself always had MurmurHash (https://code.google.com/p/smhasher/wiki/MurmurHash3 https://code.google.com/p/smhasher/wiki/MurmurHash3) in mind, mainly because I liked the touted benefits (from the possibly biased main page) and it's worked out for me. Seems like I need to educate myself a bit more.

packetslave 13y ago
There's also CityHash, which has some nice claimed performance numbers depending on your application. https://code.google.com/p/cityhash/ https://code.google.com/p/cityhash/ http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee380/Abstracts/121017-slides.pdf http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee380/Abstracts/121017-slides....