I think the ambiguity is intentional; it keeps the drama of gay marriage off of Greenwald so as to not distract from the message he's carrying. However, I think

I think the ambiguity is intentional; it keeps the drama of gay marriage off of Greenwald so as to not distract from the message he's carrying. However, I think it's a little cheesy to pull out the term "husband" when it's emotionally advantageous to do so. Even if it was just a business partner, harassing Greenwald's close associates would be just as heinous without the need to stoop to emotional manipulation.