2 ms·
So the answer is less education? There is already a two year program in the US. Problem solved. This is a bit much. You can already go to a diploma mill and sav
by dinkumthinkum 17y ago
So the answer is less education? There is already a two year program in the US. Problem solved. This is a bit much. You can already go to a diploma mill and save yourself the time. Why do in 2-3 years what can be done in a couple clicks and a laser printer?
This is just lazy. Also, the idea that "people want education that will make them money do they need to skip traditional education" seems even more ridiculous in a time when very few are studying technical fields. Also the argument that many students take classes just because they are easy is stupid and I think those proferring that argument were probably the very same students. Many students are interested in an education.
- tokenadult 17y agoSo the answer is less education? Does school attendance invariably result in "education"? How might students gain what you and I could both agree is an education at less expense?
- dinkumthinkum 17y agoI'm not talking about time but unless you devise a learning pill or device such as used in the matrix, these things Still require time and course work. There are probably more tertiary expenses that could be trimmed before the actual education. Perhaps states could actually fund the education institutions.