3 ms·
> If you read the ruling at [0], you will find you are quite mistaken. I hadn't read the ruling, just Kerr's post, and yeah I'm only more confused now, conside
by fnordfnordfnord 13y ago
> If you read the ruling at [0], you will find you are quite mistaken.
I hadn't read the ruling, just Kerr's post, and yeah I'm only more confused now, considering some of Kerr's comments. I'm just going to give up on it for today, no more time.