4 ms·
Have to agree with everyone here. The first email gives enough information to base a case on. Enough to simply do a quick search and verify these people aren't
by skeletonjelly 13y ago
Have to agree with everyone here. The first email gives enough information to base a case on. Enough to simply do a quick search and verify these people aren't friends. I get less information than this from users for a product we support, it's frustrating, but if you don't investigate each lead as a potential you run the risk of having it snowball.
Shame on Facebook for dismissing this guy's reward due to the lazy actions of one employee. It would have taken one question, or one 5 minute validation of the claims to make this a non issue.
- davis_m 13y agoHow does the first email contain enough information to base a case on? All he says is that he can post links to other people's walls. He makes absolutely no mention of not being the target's friend.
- skeletonjelly 13y agoHmm well the implication made sense to me. It would have taken a few seconds to see that these people weren't friends. And all the engineer had to do was ask at least one question to probe for more information instead of a dismissal. Edit: I'm sure Facebook engineers have something a bit more advanced that this: https://www.facebook.com/zuck?and=khalil.shr https://www.facebook.com/zuck?and=khalil.shr This link works if they know each other. Try going to your profile and adding ?and=zuck for instance
- smackfu 13y agoWhy would he be reporting it to whitehat if it was expected behavior?