5 ms·
We're releasing a new version quite soon. So once again, if there's anything you want fixed, now is the time to tell us. http://arclanguage.org/item?id=9257 h
by pg 17y ago
We're releasing a new version quite soon. So once again, if there's anything you want fixed, now is the time to tell us.
http://arclanguage.org/item?id=9257 http://arclanguage.org/item?id=9257
One of the things I want to add next is graphics libraries. Does anyone have any recommendations for what to plug into to munge images?
- crescendo 17y agoDoes anyone have any recommendations for what to plug into to munge images? ImageMagick (http://www.imagemagick.org/ http://www.imagemagick.org/) has worked well for us. There are bindings out there for many languages, including Common Lisp (http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-magick/ http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-magick/); you might want to look there for inspiration.
- pg 17y agoWe used ImageMagick to manipulate images in Viaweb. So if it's still the best thing around now, 14 years later, it must be pretty good. Thanks!
- gills 17y agoImageMagick? Cairo? OpenGL bindings?
- mbrubeck 17y agoCairo bindings would be awesome for graphing, vector art, and fancy text (and a nice complement to a bitmap manipulation library like ImageMagick).
- Take2 17y agojust out of curiosity where do graphics libraries sit relative to these ? http://arclanguage.org/item?id=4070 http://arclanguage.org/item?id=4070 Are you planning to do another poll ?
- tsally 17y ago++ for OpenGL bindings. OpenGL is one of the more expressive and creative tools someone can use while programming for fun.
- garret 17y agoHere's another one. http://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2009/graphicsmagick-saved-the-day/ http://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2009/graphicsmagick-saved-the-...