That's more of an orthogonal point than a counter point though. Just because we haven't accomplished something yet doesn't mean we shouldn't invest any more eff

That's more of an orthogonal point than a counter point though. Just because we haven't accomplished something yet doesn't mean we shouldn't invest any more effort into it. I was responding to your insinuation that OP must not be knowledgeable about language implementation to hold the views he/she does. In this context, technological limitations are irrelevant because that was not the point; the point was an opinion about the relative effort/attention these problems receive. I'm admittedly not really invested in this area myself so I don't really care, but it's disingenuous to try and discredit OP's views like that. At least this response is more of a direct counter-opinion.