3 ms·
There is no evidence that mutual funds (or any other active managers) can outperform the stock market.[1] This can be explained by the strong form of the effic
by nickff 13y ago
There is no evidence that mutual funds (or any other active managers) can outperform the stock market.[1] This can be explained by the strong form of the efficient markets hypothesis; "In strong-form efficiency, share prices reflect all information, public and private, and no one can earn excess returns." [2]
[1] http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.Cochrane/teaching/35150_advanced_investments/Luck%20versus%20Skilll%20in%20the%20Cross%20Section%20of%20Mutual%20Fund%20Returns.pdf http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.Cochrane/teaching/35150...
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficient-market_hypothesis#Strong-form_efficiency http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficient-market_hypothesis#Str...
- jcnnghm 13y agoThe market is definitely not strong-form efficient. If it were, you wouldn't have any price movement attributable to earnings surprises, because the private information would already be priced in. More importantly, markets are only efficient because some people are researching and trading to the true underlying value. The whole reason markets are supposed to be efficient is because if they are not, there is an opportunity to make riskless arbitrage profit, which someone will exploit.
- nickff 13y agoStrong form efficiency does not imply perfectly predictive of all future events. Such a claim would imply that no durable good could increase in price at a rate higher than the federal funds rate plus some risk premium (haircut).