4 ms·
> An even worse solution is getting rid of loans. A good solution is making loans optional like in Scandinavia. Universities are pretty much free, but some stu
by nawitus 13y ago
> An even worse solution is getting rid of loans.
A good solution is making loans optional like in Scandinavia. Universities are pretty much free, but some students take loans to get by.
- ethanbond 13y agoSo you're saying, "A good solution is to lower the price of education." I agree. I think we all would. But how? Loans are already very optional - that's a nonsolution.
- nawitus 13y agoMake the government pay for education.
- hyperventilator 13y agoYou will not make things more efficient by having them run by the government, you will only create another unfunded mandate. While it may seem that it is free if the government pays for it, obviously someone pays. The least cost effective way to run something is through a government bureaucracy, that should be pretty clear by now.
- danielweber 13y agoYou still need price pressure on the schools. If tuition keeps on going through the roof but no one cares because it's "free" we're still blowing a lot of money that could better be spent elsewhere.
- nawitus 13y agoI'm not sure how it's done in Scandinavia. I think the government can simply fund public universities with a lump sump (per student), and disallow any tuition charges. Universities could then raise additional private money to use as they see fit.
- Ras_ 13y agoIn Finland the operating costs are nationally averaged to make up unit rate (google: yksikköhinta). Majority of state funding can be then traced back to Unit rate x number of students.