3 ms·
I'm not sure I agree with you. I don't deny OpenID's problems. But to me the issue is whether OpenID is completely unredeemable. Which I think it's far from
by TomOfTTB 17y ago
I'm not sure I agree with you. I don't deny OpenID's problems. But to me the issue is whether OpenID is completely unredeemable. Which I think it's far from being.
If nothing else it already has two things going for it. The first is positive press and the second is a legion of fans (some of which border on sycophants) So the question is wouldn't it be better to fix the problems in this spec rather than make another. I think so. In fact I think trying to create a new spec can be a disaster.
If you need proof of why this is ture look at all the people who continue to use RSS over Atom because of a standards fight that happened years ago.
- jasonkester 17y agoYou're right that redesigning it from scratch will probably make it even more complicated. I guess that's a point against. The tough part of modifying the existing implementation will be the URLs-as-Usernames thing. They seem set on that and it just isn't flying.