3 ms·
I, nor the person before you, weren't questioning your ability to empathize with the original story. I'm not sure why you chose to highlight facts that back tha
by mbesto 13y ago
I, nor the person before you, weren't questioning your ability to empathize with the original story. I'm not sure why you chose to highlight facts that back that up.
Feel free to do the same thing
I don't want to. You have influence on this site and it's very likely someone will read your original comment and take your conclusion to be true because "someone influential said it on the internet". Your generalization is consistent with mine, but the conclusion is unfounded.
An immigrant is deciding to go onto a risky path in life fairly consciously which would explain the difference in outcome.
But immigration in of itself, does not constitute a risky path. Hence my example of Americans in the UK.
- jacquesm 13y agoI agree with you that an American moving to the UK is not taking a risky path. But that is not the general case for immigration, it is rather an outlier.