3 ms·
I was thinking in terms of something designed from the start for ground-attack/bombing, but my point is that the Navy can't possibly think it needs the same lig
by nknighthb 13y ago
I was thinking in terms of something designed from the start for ground-attack/bombing, but my point is that the Navy can't possibly think it needs the same lightweight fighters the Air Force wants just because they operate from carriers, since they spent >35 years running a big-ass plane off carriers.
(For that matter, there were the C-130 tests on a carrier, which was probably pushing the bounds of good sense, but it did work.)