3 ms·
The sarcasm in my post was unnecessary, so I've replaced it with a better explanation.
by dap 13y ago
The sarcasm in my post was unnecessary, so I've replaced it with a better explanation.
- danabramov 13y agoThanks for taking time! I still don't agree though, I edited my post as well to explain why I think this is exactly the moment you need to tweak the language, and not the libraries. (And this is the point Miguel was trying to make when he differentiated `async` from “futures” libraries, even from the one `async` uses, because they are irrelevant to the discussion.)