3 ms·

Actually, ReQL is basically stable as of 1.8. There may be very minor changes before 2.0, but there are no big changes planned any more.

• ddorian43 13y ago
  So, is there too much overhead for each table (to create per-client tables since custom_field sharding is not yet available) ?
  • coffeemug 13y ago
    Tables are a little bit heavy now. I don't know the exact overhead (we should measure), but a table is certainly heavier than a single document. I'm not sure if a table/client is tenable -- if end up doing some tests could you please report the results?
• dkhenry 13y ago
  So no new verbs going into the Query Language ? I have been waiting to do much more work around my Java driver until the pace of change slows down a bit.
  • coffeemug 13y ago
    Yep, that's right. We might make very minor tweaks to existing commands, but there are no new commands planned as of now.
  • jroesch 13y ago
    Same I had been working on a Scala one, but had slowed down as I couldn't keep up with the Rethink team's releases.