3 ms·
That number is a bit disingenuous, since some of the individual bullet points are pretty catch-all. For instance, No bath, beauty, and cosmetic products; elect
by zhemao 13y ago
That number is a bit disingenuous, since some of the individual bullet points are pretty catch-all. For instance,
No bath, beauty, and cosmetic products; electronic surveillance equipment; eyewear (sunglasses, prescription glasses, and others); firearms, weapons, knives, weapon accessories, and replicas of weapons; medical, health, safety, and personal care products; or infomercial-type products.
That's a lot of mostly unrelated things.
- dnautics 13y agoIndeed. I meant for 10 to look large, not small. So, yes, kickstarter has its own reasons for banning various things; and just throw another one onto the heap. They don't bother explaining why these are banned, so why the double standard with GMOs? Actually - all of these things have in common that they're regulated and I think kickstarter doesn't want to run afoul of penalties from regulatory breach or incur regulatory costs or burdens. To a certain degree (region dependent, use-dependent, etc) GMOs are the same way. Arabidopsis is a weed, but you can eat it. Anecdotally, it's quite tasty.