50 ms·
You're making a number of baseless assumptions about the quality of my job. I'd say my company is more than ideal. In fact, I'd say that we're pretty darn close
by EnderMB 13y ago
You're making a number of baseless assumptions about the quality of my job. I'd say my company is more than ideal. In fact, I'd say that we're pretty darn close to having one of the best processes I've seen in an agency or startup.
We work very closely with designers. We're a part of all kick-off meetings, we're involved in all phases, we even sit in during workshops so we understand the process from the client perspective. It is a process that works well in all manners of small business, and most importantly, it works for our clients.
My design work is basic because the task is basic. Why pay for a designers time when I can modify something in 5 minutes? It's basic common sense to do so.
- randomdata 13y ago> You're making a number of baseless assumptions about the quality of my job... We work very closely with designers. Unless you disagree with my earlier premise that the skills see some atrophy if not used, then you most certainly do not have an environment that fosters designer/developer skills. If you have specialized roles, and you are handing the majority of the design work over to a dedicated designer, then you are left with a developer seeing an emphasis on developing code. I do not have to make any assumptions, that is just basic mathematics. Jumping into Photoshop every once in a while to help out does not lead to a "senior level designer" as you already attested to yourself. You have to have intense focus on both almost every day if you want to see senior level quality on both sides. It can be done, but the jobs are quite rare, so few people ever have the opportunity to reach that level. It goes without saying that finding such people then becomes a challenge, but not because of it being some fundamental truth. Programming itself requires design skills, so we know all (good) programmers have what it takes to be good designers by default, they just need an environment to frequently practice those skills in contexts other than the text editor.
- EnderMB 13y agoI had written comments for the rest of your points, but then I read your final paragraph. > Programming itself requires design skills, so we know all (good) programmers have what it takes to be good designers by default, they just need an environment to frequently practice those skills in contexts other than the text editor. This is a huge red flag for me. The design skills you are talking about are incomparable to the design skills my comments have referenced.
- randomdata 13y agoIt is well understood in programming circles that the code layout/design is one of the most important aspects of maintainability, and achieving that requires exercising the same parts of the brain that any other design work does. The most obtuse example is the old Perl one-liner, which is generally void of any real design thought, and can scare away the best programmers just at the first glance. But even code that attempts to be written well can fall short without the developer having some design sensibilities; the same sensibilities that apply to any design medium. Good code, and therefore maintainable code, brings on a positive emotional response before you even start reading the content within. That's straight up design. The exact same kind of work you do in Photoshop, a piece of paper with a pencil, paint and canvas, etc. You claimed earlier to not be able to call yourself a designer, so I'm going to assume you do not have the experience outside of the code medium to see the overlap, but that doesn't mean it is not there.