I think it is a fair guideline. It is so easy to spin and editorialize issues just by playing a bit around with a few words. It also avoids click baiting as mo

I think it is a fair guideline. It is so easy to spin and editorialize issues just by playing a bit around with a few words. It also avoids click baiting as most users probably can tell already by the url in how far a certain medium (...) uses sensationalist headlines. If somebody thinks that there is a different view or a overlooked aspect in a linked submission that is not reflected by the headline it would probably be best to blog about it and resubmit the link to the blog. The policy is public, it is consistently applied to any submission, even if you don't follow it the problem is fixed by an admin. I don't see any issue here that demands that kind of public outrage, let alone some kind of weird formal public letters.