So it seems that the problem here is one field trying to do two jobs. It would take a change to the way things are presented, but what about having a title tha

So it seems that the problem here is one field trying to do two jobs. It would take a change to the way things are presented, but what about having a title that is the same as the original article, and then another line -- a subtitle, if you will -- that (optionally) can contain the poster's rationale for contributing the link. In this case it could be: Civil Disobedience <small>David Byrne on Aaron Swartz</small>