3 ms·
Actually - in a number of those countries its legally required for them to be covered. The point is different - you can't use an extreme example of a hijab to c
by kamakazizuru 13y ago
Actually - in a number of those countries its legally required for them to be covered. The point is different - you can't use an extreme example of a hijab to claim that western values are uniquely good - and those coming from eastern countries only create a negative cultural impact. If you understood the point of the article - the goal isn't to increase the birth rate. The goal is to make sure the population doesn't fall to a level where it will not be able to sustain the social structures that exist. This can be countered by controlled highly skilled immigration and is working perfectly fine in Canada and New Zealand among other places. For what its worth though - of all people you should probably be glad not everyone thought that people from the east should stay where they are - otherwise you with all your extreme views on this would've still been stuck in your walled garden in India. Driving around in your foreign car. What an unfortunate existence!