5 ms·

You prefer C over JavaScript? Header files? Pointer arithmetic hell? Precompiler Macros? Manual Memory Management? Seriously? To each their own, though.

• dkuntz2 13y ago
  No. I prefer C over JavaScript for embedded devices. And actually in most places, too. I know I'm weird, but I really like pointers, because I really like being able to manually setup data structures, and enjoy the power provided by pointers. Manual memory management isn't horribly fun, but for embedded devices I would rather be in charge of that over the chip having to do it for me. It means that if there's ever a memory overflow, it's my own damn fault, and I have the ability to fix it. JavaScript is an acceptable scripting language. It's not my favorite, but it works. I just don't think scripting languages should really be used on embedded devices.
  • woofyman 13y ago
    I also prefer C and C++ over every other high level languages when performance is essential.
  • lttlrck 13y ago
    Not even for scripting them?
    • dkuntz2 13y ago
      I would rather use Python for scripting.
    • zhemao 13y ago
      There's not really much need for scripting on an embedded device. Embedded systems are meant to do a single task and run continuously. If he is already comfortable with C, he clearly doesn't have much use for a language like Javascript when it comes to microcontrollers.
  • Tichy 13y ago
    Sure if you write very low level stuff, C is probably more suitable. I wonder how much today's "embedded devices" still have in common with traditional embedded devices, though? If it is capable of running JavaScript, it probably is a lot more powerful than some microprocessor with just 2KB RAM where you have to squeeze every bit out of your code. On the PI you can run a complete Linux installation. I don't think these devices are actually embedded, they are just smaller than "normal" computers.
    • dkuntz2 13y ago
      JavaScript, and scripting languages in general (and, to be more specific, dynamically typed languages, too, but those tend to be scripting languages, anyways) tend to have a lot of gotchas, and when it comes to controlling physical things, I think that less gotchas are better. Yes, statically typed languages just put a bunch of metadata in the code, but I think it's useful to have the guarantees provided by a static type system when your controlling things. Like if you're controlling a robot arm. I'd rather have the type system make sure I don't try to do something stupid, like add a string to an int that's controlling the degree of the arm. Static languages make sure you can't do that, most dynamic language will let you do that.
      • marknutter 13y ago
        Then just write more unit tests and you'll be fine.
        • deleted 13y ago
          [deleted]
      • Tichy 13y ago
        It would definitely depend on the kind of project (for me at least). I probably wouldn't recommend writing the controller for some medical device in JavaScript. My impression was that devices like the one here are more for tinker projects, making LEDs blink and stuff like that. Although I also don't agree that statical typing makes things so much more safe. And what can also happen is that in the world of statically typed languages bad workarounds are then invented for the inflexibility. An example would be the XML craziness that plagued the Java world for a long time.
• jebblue 13y ago
  Like Java, C is deterministic. Try adding a string and an integer in JS, what happens when JS is controlling real hardware, directly, and the coder said do this but the code (JS) does something else? I can't imagine coding medical devices with JS and hoping they always do exactly what their coders thought the JS they wrote would do.
• zhemao 13y ago
  On an embedded microcontroller, pointers and manual memory management tend to be less of an issue, as you're doing most of the stuff on the stack. I don't think I've ever had a reason to call malloc in an embedded C application before. If you were doing networking, however, it would probably be much more complicated. In that case, Javascript might be useful. But on the other hand, there are high-level languages that I would greatly prefer over Javascript.
  • Tichy 13y ago
    Which ones, though?
    • zhemao 13y ago
      Pretty much every one except Perl or PHP.
  • woofyman 13y ago
    Generally, embedded applications know how much memory is needed at start-up based on the specification. So global memory is statically allocated.
• tn13 13y ago
  C rules the embedded systems world. By embedded system I refer to the serious applications such as automotive systems and so on and not some funky new toy project done using Arduino. There are some very good reasons why C can not be replaced by any other programming language when it comes to safety critical embedded systems. That is what separates men from boys.
  • smilekzs 13y ago
    As long as you write C correctly, which can be verbose when things get complex. This project seems to be less concerned with the realtime aspect and more concerned with wiring things together. To me it functions as an OpenWRT/RasPi hybrid, with the Node runtime.
• tn13 13y ago
  When you have a hardware that has got 512KB memory, 5 volt battery and you have to ensure that an event occurs every 10milliseconds it is C which beats JS or any other language hands down.