Since the rejection is based on the results of a search, it looks like a deliberate attempt to torpedo the review process - maybe on the basis that they don't w

Since the rejection is based on the results of a search, it looks like a deliberate attempt to torpedo the review process - maybe on the basis that they don't want users going to content that isn't monetizable? Doubt it - I have a reader on my iPhone (Stanza) that can download free eBooks just like this application. The best word to describe Apple's approval process is Kafkaesque. It's not their rules that are the problem; it is the total internal inconsistency.