In other societies, what you're referring to might be called an Ombudsman, or in our judicial system, a district attorney. There is no such counterpoint in gov

In other societies, what you're referring to might be called an Ombudsman, or in our judicial system, a district attorney. There is no such counterpoint in government, save our elected officials. Specifically, the reason the Commander in Chief is a civilian seems to be for this exact reason. Anyways, I think the concept of a dissenting opinion would be welcome from the public's perspective and shunned from the bureaucratic one.