> clang's website attempts to demonstrate the superiority of clang by comparing against the error messages from gcc 4.2 Even if it that doesn't hold true anymo

> clang's website attempts to demonstrate the superiority of clang by comparing against the error messages from gcc 4.2 Even if it that doesn't hold true anymore, I think it's valid to highlight since it's one of the motivations, probably one of the original creators' pain points with GCC. The website reads: Some of the goals for the project include the following: End-User Features: - Expressive diagnostics (examples)