Some of these fall premises, are actually admitted to be true in the article... wtf? Also, a lot of the quotes are not so much against a/b test, but people who

Some of these fall premises, are actually admitted to be true in the article... wtf? Also, a lot of the quotes are not so much against a/b test, but people who claim a/b testing is a panacea, and are recommending the wrong tools to the wrong people. (ie tools based around static content to people with entirely dynamically generated content) basically the biggest problem with a/b testing is that some of it's most noisy proponents have no idea what they're talking about. (this is true of a lot of things)