5 ms·
I have the same problem: Firefox 23 on Debian; Intel GPU (so pretty solid drivers), get.webgl.org works fine and I can't remember when I last had trouble with 3
by anonymouz 13y ago
I have the same problem: Firefox 23 on Debian; Intel GPU (so pretty solid drivers), get.webgl.org works fine and I can't remember when I last had trouble with 3D, but the OP's site crashes my browser.
Then again "in the wild" I wouldn't enable WebGL anyway for most sites.
Edit: I think it's a Firefox problem. Works in Chromium for me.
- warfangle 13y agoFunky. Might be a compatibility issue with Three.js.
- McP 13y agoIntel GPUs != solid OpenGL drivers. I do a lot of work in OpenGL and I curse Intel almost daily for the multitude of bugs in their OpenGL implementations. The GPUs' only saving grace is their ubiquity so at least I get a bug report quite quickly when a work-around is required.
- kleiba 13y agoWhich GPUs would you recommend on Linux?
- vacri 13y agoThe pendulum has certainly swung away from ATI/AMD.
- zurn 13y agoVery latest Intel is ok, older are pretty slow. AMD hardware that works with the Mesa drivers is nearly as solid as Intel, but their proprietary drivers are a disaster (kernel crashes etc). Nvidia has decent proprietary drivers for desktop stuff. On laptops, dual graphics (Nvidia calls it "Optimus", don't know about AMD) doesn't work right so Intel and Mesa-supported integrated AMD graphics are the best choices on laptops currently. There's some light at the end of the tunnel for Nvidia: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/HybridGraphics https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/HybridGraphics
- thristian 13y agoAre you specifically talking about the Linux drivers for Intel GPUs? Their OpenGL implementation is based on the open-source Mesa project, which, while not perfect, has been worked on steadily for over a decade, and has been pretty solid in my experience. Not fast, certainly, but solid.