4 ms·
i don't necesasrily disagree with you here, but i think that the process would be better if it were a rolling review with constant feedback and dialog, instead
by noodle 17y ago
i don't necesasrily disagree with you here, but i think that the process would be better if it were a rolling review with constant feedback and dialog, instead of something built up as an important once-a-year event.
- Retric 17y agoRolling feedback should be part of the annual review process at any competent company. Where I work the annual review looks at those above, below, and beside you and doing that several times a year is far to time consuming. IMO, the trick is managing the less formal feedback and using that as part of the formal review. Which is why your manager does not create your review. They might be biased by something from last week but your coworkers tend to think back to the important projects over the year.
- TallGuyShort 17y agoOh I agree with that - it's important to cultivate an environment where constructive feedback is constantly being exchanged. That's hard to do - but when it happens, it makes a big difference.