3 ms·
Another benefit of blocking scripts by default. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/scriptsafe/oiigbmnaadbkfbmpbfijlflahbdbdgdf https://chrome.google.com
by obituary_latte 13y ago
Another benefit of blocking scripts by default.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/scriptsafe/oiigbmnaadbkfbmpbfijlflahbdbdgdf https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/scriptsafe/oiigbmn...
http://noscript.net/ http://noscript.net/
Shame that they're necessary, but they work well if you can handle the inconvenience of selectively unblocking scripts.
- Ntrails 13y agoIt also means that sights with more than 4-5 things I have to unblock go completely unread as I am unwilling to keep going through them to find the non trash sources.
- obituary_latte 13y agoThere is an "Allow all blocked for session" button on the extension that will usually get the site loaded for you with one click. You can also go to the extension options and white-list the domain(s). You can use wildcards there so you don't have to type all the relevant subdomains (e.g. cdn.example.com would be included with a *.example.com whitelist entry).
- simonebrunozzi 13y agoDid you try: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/script-blocker/edkpojcedjaijmpkagegbjikonnceidm https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/script-blocker/edk... How do you compare them?
- obituary_latte 13y agoI have not tried it, sorry.
- raimue 13y agoIf they make it that complicated to get to their actual content I simply won't read it. I should not be required to block any scripts in order to make a website usable.