4 ms·
The tubes for the passenger-only version would be 20 to 23 mm in thickness. I'm not sure what damage a medium-sized gun would do to steel that thick.
by conroy 13y ago
The tubes for the passenger-only version would be 20 to 23 mm in thickness. I'm not sure what damage a medium-sized gun would do to steel that thick.
- notaddicted 13y agoAccording to some quick youtube searching, armor-piercing rounds versus regular steel would create problems: http://youtu.be/q_zZd0NsYG4 http://youtu.be/q_zZd0NsYG4 .
- bloaf 13y agoSure, so would high explosives directly on the tube. I am considering a situation that could conceivably be accidental because it is incredibly difficult to engineer something that can stand up to malice.
- jlgreco 13y agoThe bar to malice is important to consider. If the bar is "high explosives or shaped charges", then you are probably okay. If the bar is "a redneck who is bored with shooting stop-signs", then that might be a problem.
- glibgil 13y agoBored people don't shoot guns at trains today. Why would they start?
- kingkawn 13y agoBecause there's no possibility that shooting at a train would result in a fireball a thousand yards high, whereas...
- louthy 13y agoBecause the tube isn't a train?
- jlgreco 13y agoAre you sure? I imagine most trains these days are pretty tolerant of that, it could easily go unnoticed.
- JoeAltmaier 13y agoBored people shoot track, put pennies on tracks, drop water balloons from freeway overpasses, put potatoes in car exhaust pipes, and on and on. Its important to consider the most random variable in the safety equation - bored people. I'd say all these concerns warrant putting the damn thing underground.