This is a clear example of the judge over stepping her bounds. The first statement, that the name could gave a negative impact on the child, makes some sense.

This is a clear example of the judge over stepping her bounds. The first statement, that the name could gave a negative impact on the child, makes some sense. The second statement does not and really doesn't have a place in the court room. Just because this judge believes Jesus is the only messiah and only he should be called that doesn't mean she has the right to change it. What's next will every person named Jesus have to have their name changed to Jose? Will every person named Mohammed have to have their name changed?