5 ms·
Really? "7.2 watt-hours in 15 seconds in watts" doesn't "just work" in google. Can you post a one-liner that does the same calculation in google or other site?
by savrajsingh 17y ago
Really? "7.2 watt-hours in 15 seconds in watts" doesn't "just work" in google. Can you post a one-liner that does the same calculation in google or other site?
- Oompa 17y agohttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=7.2+watt%2Fhours+*+15+seconds+in+watts&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi= http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=7.2+wa... Works fine, used it all the time in my Physics class.
- savrajsingh 17y agoThat calculation is not the same one I'm asking for. It's not watts per hour as you've written -- it's actually watt-hours (watt * hour). The answer is also incorrect -- it's not 0.03 watts -- it's 1730 watts. So my request still stands -- show me a one-liner for my original calculation. It's not as simple as you think. ;) Ok I did some more experimentation and discovered this: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ei=ePsUSs_lJ6HqtQP7l8WqCQ&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=7.2+watt+hours+per+15+seconds+in+watts&spell=1 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ei=ePsUSs_lJ6HqtQP7l8...