3 ms·

>In the great tradition of Revenge of the Nerds (1984) In which the protagonist commits rape by fraud, dressing up in a costume of Betty's boyfriend, then havi

by gte910h 13y ago

>In the great tradition of Revenge of the Nerds (1984) In which the protagonist commits rape by fraud, dressing up in a costume of Betty's boyfriend, then having sex with her under false pretenses? Probably not the best movie to shine as a star of anything good sexually. (The peeping tom crap too)

merlincorey 13y ago
Wow our culture today! My stars. It's my interpretation that the protagonist in question provides oral sex to the lady and stimulated her clitoris in ways her jock boyfriend never thought or knew how to. It's my understanding she definitely enjoyed that. It is also my understanding that she was not too pleased to find out who was behind the mask at first. It's further my understanding that Revenge of the Nerds II: Nerds in Paradise (1987) [1] intimates that they then became something of an "item" (in today's terms that means they dated!). Finally, it's my understanding that it's a fun movie and not a manual for life. [1] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093857 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093857
- gte910h 13y ago
  That's not our culture today. That was the culture 29 years ago. Her reaction and enjoyment at a later time is immaterial: It's rape (or sexual assault, depending on jurisdiction) to have sex this way. Rape and sexual assault are something you can pick out before you engage in them. >it's a fun movie and not a manual for life. It certainly can be a fun movie and have misguided lessons for people. Many old pieces of art do this, but are still enjoyable in other places. That said, the bad parts should still be pointed out clearly as bad, even if it taints enjoyable experiences of our youth. They aren't harmless. They normalize this crap and convince young fools this type of thing is fun instead of criminal.
  - ceol 13y ago
    Exactly. Pointing out that problematic elements exist in a piece of media does not mean that piece can't be enjoyed! Just that one should be aware of those elements and understand why they are problematic.

by gte910h 13y ago

merlincorey 13y ago

Wow our culture today! My stars. It's my interpretation that the protagonist in question provides oral sex to the lady and stimulated her clitoris in ways her jock boyfriend never thought or knew how to. It's my understanding she definitely enjoyed that. It is also my understanding that she was not too pleased to find out who was behind the mask at first. It's further my understanding that Revenge of the Nerds II: Nerds in Paradise (1987) [1] intimates that they then became something of an "item" (in today's terms that means they dated!). Finally, it's my understanding that it's a fun movie and not a manual for life. [1] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093857 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093857

gte910h 13y ago
That's not our culture today. That was the culture 29 years ago. Her reaction and enjoyment at a later time is immaterial: It's rape (or sexual assault, depending on jurisdiction) to have sex this way. Rape and sexual assault are something you can pick out before you engage in them. >it's a fun movie and not a manual for life. It certainly can be a fun movie and have misguided lessons for people. Many old pieces of art do this, but are still enjoyable in other places. That said, the bad parts should still be pointed out clearly as bad, even if it taints enjoyable experiences of our youth. They aren't harmless. They normalize this crap and convince young fools this type of thing is fun instead of criminal.
- ceol 13y ago
  Exactly. Pointing out that problematic elements exist in a piece of media does not mean that piece can't be enjoyed! Just that one should be aware of those elements and understand why they are problematic.