3 ms·

The 400,000 figure does not seem to exist anywhere else online. Searching "400,000" and "rape" returns no results regarding date rape, the closest results I can

The 400,000 figure does not seem to exist anywhere else online. Searching "400,000" and "rape" returns no results regarding date rape, the closest results I can find relate to the number of rape survivors in the Congo (400,000). This wikipedia article on date rape suggests that roughly 2% of date rape victims have been drugged, so if the 400,000 figure is to be believed that means there are 20,000,000 date rape victims every year? That seems... unbelievable! This figure seems to be pulled out of nowhere. Also worth mentioining that the #1 date rape drug is... alcohol! This article smells a lot like FUD. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_rape_drug#Frequency_of_occurrence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_rape_drug#Frequency_of_occ... edit: and in the video the project creator claims over a million people are victims every year, again no citation. edit edit: found a study that claims 4% of rape victims had been drugged[1] and according to RAINN there are ~200,000 rape victims every year[2] [1] https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/212000.pdf https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/212000.pdf [2] http://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/frequency-of-sexual-assault http://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/frequency-of... So assuming the RAINN figure is accurate and the study figure is accurate that means there is ~10,000 drug involved date rapes per year.

reeses 13y ago
I would not be surprised if a factor was mixed in for the "most rapes go unreported, especially date rapes," estimates.[1] Given these figures, either the 3% conviction rate or the 46% reporting rate, a person could take numbers that may or may not already include these adjustments and apply the most helpful. 10,000 x 33 = 330,000, might as well round up to 400k.[2] I'm not saying that's what happened in this case, but abuse of confidence intervals is an common problem, even among those with good intentions and little idea that what they're doing is misleading. [1] http://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/reporting-rates http://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/reporting-ra... [2] This guy says 400k, but we know that less than half are ever reported, so it's probably closer to a million. And so on.
rxp 13y ago
RAINN's numbers only cover the US, as far as I can see, and the US is only about 5% of the world's population. So if we extrapolate naively from your numbers, we end up with 160,000, which is a lot closer to the figure from the article.

reeses 13y ago

I would not be surprised if a factor was mixed in for the "most rapes go unreported, especially date rapes," estimates.[1] Given these figures, either the 3% conviction rate or the 46% reporting rate, a person could take numbers that may or may not already include these adjustments and apply the most helpful. 10,000 x 33 = 330,000, might as well round up to 400k.[2] I'm not saying that's what happened in this case, but abuse of confidence intervals is an common problem, even among those with good intentions and little idea that what they're doing is misleading. [1] http://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/reporting-rates http://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/reporting-ra... [2] This guy says 400k, but we know that less than half are ever reported, so it's probably closer to a million. And so on.

rxp 13y ago

RAINN's numbers only cover the US, as far as I can see, and the US is only about 5% of the world's population. So if we extrapolate naively from your numbers, we end up with 160,000, which is a lot closer to the figure from the article.