3 ms·
I've discussed this topic of consciousness with others and there is a common visceral reaction (like the one in this comment) that is common when challenging th
by wellpast 13y ago
I've discussed this topic of consciousness with others and there is a common visceral reaction (like the one in this comment) that is common when challenging the presumed location of consciousness, especially from programmers, and I'm curious why.
One thought I've had is that programmers (given our profession) tend to fetishize the idea that ultimately we will understand the brain well enough to recreate consciousness in machine and code. It's pretty exciting to believe that as a programmer; much like it was probably exciting to think that we were at the center of a Ptolemaic universe.
I'm okay with someone wanting to ask whether the world is really flat, even if he doesn't address what other shape it could be. I found this article to be a very interesting questioning about some assumptions we have regarding consciousness.
- dvanduzer 13y agoI think most of the "argument" comes from the conflation of the "what is it like" with "where does it live" questions.[0] Most of the "dumb" arguments about "where does it live" are actually "what is it like" questions, most of which are thoroughly disposed of in Dennett's Quining Qualia.[1] [0] http://lesswrong.com/lw/no/how_an_algorithm_feels_from_inside/ http://lesswrong.com/lw/no/how_an_algorithm_feels_from_insid... [1] http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/quinqual.htm http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/quinqual.htm